Khan v Khan [2001] EWCA Civ 1256 (12 July 2001)
The applicant's claim is wholly unparticularised, time-barred, and raises no important point of principle or practice. The original ancillary relief order did not turn on the alleged false evidence, and there is no compelling reason to grant permission for a second-tier appeal.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1256
- Parties
- Petitioner/respondent: Kamal Unnisa Begum Khan; Respondent/applicant: Nasrullah Khan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Tier)
- Outcome
- application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Strike Out Application, Fraud Allegation, Limitation Period, Appeal Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kamal Unnisa Begum Khan
Petitioner/respondent
Nasrullah Khan
Respondent/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Tier)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's claim alleging fraud and false evidence in prior ancillary relief proceedings should be allowed to proceed
- 2 Whether there is an important point of principle or practice or other compelling reason to grant permission for a second-tier appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's claim is wholly unparticularised, time-barred, and raises no important point of principle or practice. The original ancillary relief order did not turn on the alleged false evidence, and there is no compelling reason to grant permission for a second-tier appeal.
Court Disposition
application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment