Waiwaiku v Waiwaiku
There was no evidence to support the wife's allegations of concealed assets or under-declared income. The lower court's revocation of the lump sum order was correct, as lump sums should be paid from available capital, which was not present. No important point of principle or practice was raised to justify a second appeal.
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Kokulo Nyanpee Waiwaiku; Respondent/applicant: Leona Viki Waiwaiku
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- application for permission to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Lump Sum Order, Periodical Payments, Financial Disclosure, Appeals Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kokulo Nyanpee Waiwaiku
Appellant/respondent
Leona Viki Waiwaiku
Respondent/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lower court erred in revoking the lump sum order of £30,000 in ancillary relief
- 2 Whether there was sufficient evidence of non-disclosure or concealment of assets by the husband
- 3 Whether there is an important point of principle or practice to justify a second appeal
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence to support the wife's allegations of concealed assets or under-declared income. The lower court's revocation of the lump sum order was correct, as lump sums should be paid from available capital, which was not present. No important point of principle or practice was raised to justify a second appeal.
Court Disposition
application for permission to appeal dismissed
Orders
- applications for permission to appeal and a stay of execution refused
- Mrs Waiwaiku to be supplied with a copy of the judgment at public expense
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment