Andrew v Beatrice & Ors [2023] EWFC 114 (B) (12 July 2023)
The notice requirement in s.44(2) and (3) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 is directory, not imperative. Non-compliance does not automatically bar the adoption application if no party is prejudiced and there is no bad faith.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] EWFC 114 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant: Andrew; First Respondent: Beatrice; Second Respondent: David; Third Respondent: Charlie
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Application / Preliminary Issue Judgment on Compliance With Statutory Notice Requirements
- Outcome
- Application allowed to proceed to final hearing
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Statutory Interpretation, Procedural Compliance, Human Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew
Applicant
Beatrice
First Respondent
David
Second Respondent
Charlie
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Application / Preliminary Issue Judgment on Compliance With Statutory Notice Requirements
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notice requirement in s.44(2) and (3) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 is imperative or directory
- 2 Whether non-compliance with the notice requirement invalidates the adoption application
Ratio Decidendi
The notice requirement in s.44(2) and (3) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 is directory, not imperative. Non-compliance does not automatically bar the adoption application if no party is prejudiced and there is no bad faith.
Court Disposition
Application allowed to proceed to final hearing
Orders
- The applicant's adoption application shall be determined at a final hearing on 17 October 2023 on its merits notwithstanding breach of the notice requirements in ss. 44(2) & (3) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment