Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB) (20 June 2024)
Section 10 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 confers on trade unions the right to sue in tort, including defamation, and the prohibition on treating a trade union as a body corporate is subject to express or implied authorisation in Part I. Trade unions possess sufficient personality to bring libel claims, and there is no public interest bar to such claims. The EETPU case is not determinative under the current statutory regime.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Prospect; Defendant: Andrew Evans
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation and Malicious Falsehood / Application to Strike Out Defamation Claim or Declaration of No Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Application to strike out libel claim or for declaration of no jurisdiction dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Standing of Trade Unions in Defamation, Interpretation of Consolidation Statutes, Quasi Corporate Status, Public Interest in Defamation Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prospect
Claimant
Andrew Evans
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation and Malicious Falsehood / Application to Strike Out Defamation Claim or Declaration of No Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Does a trade union have standing to sue in defamation?
- 2 Does section 10 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 preclude trade unions from bringing libel claims?
- 3 Is it contrary to public interest for a trade union to sue for defamation?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 10 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 confers on trade unions the right to sue in tort, including defamation, and the prohibition on treating a trade union as a body corporate is subject to express or implied authorisation in Part I. Trade unions possess sufficient personality to bring libel claims, and there is no public interest bar to such claims. The EETPU case is not determinative under the current statutory regime.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out libel claim or for declaration of no jurisdiction dismissed.
Orders
- Claimant trade union is entitled to bring a claim for libel in its own name.
- Defendant's application to strike out the libel claim or for declaration of no jurisdiction is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment