Woodward v Grice
The Defendant published false and defamatory statements alleging the Claimant was a struck off solicitor, causing serious harm to reputation and feelings. The Defendant acted recklessly, motivated by hostile animus, persisted in the libel, and pursued damaging slurs in proceedings. Damages are assessed at £18,000, reflecting aggravation, and permanent injunctive relief is granted to prevent repetition.
- Parties
- Claimant: Graham Woodward; Defendant: Andrew Grice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Libel / Assessment of Damages and Injunctive Relief Following Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Aggravated Damages, Injunctive Relief, Assessment of Damages, Mitigation and Aggravation of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Graham Woodward
Claimant
Andrew Grice
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel / Assessment of Damages and Injunctive Relief Following Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant's publication constituted libel against the Claimant
- 2 Assessment of damages for libel including aggravated damages
- 3 Entitlement to injunctive relief
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant published false and defamatory statements alleging the Claimant was a struck off solicitor, causing serious harm to reputation and feelings. The Defendant acted recklessly, motivated by hostile animus, persisted in the libel, and pursued damaging slurs in proceedings. Damages are assessed at £18,000, reflecting aggravation, and permanent injunctive relief is granted to prevent repetition.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant
Orders
- Damages awarded in the sum of £18,000
- Permanent injunctive relief granted in terms of draft submitted by Claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment