The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy v Rosenblatt
The defendant knew, or wilfully shut his eyes to the fact, that all 43 impugned transactions were connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT; his conduct as director was unfit and merits disqualification.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy; Defendant: Andrew Scott Rosenblatt
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Director's Disqualification Claim / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; defendant found unfit to be concerned in the management of a company.
- Legal Topics
- Director's Disqualification, VAT Fraud, Missing Trader Fraud, Due Diligence, Unfit Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Claimant
Andrew Scott Rosenblatt
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Director's Disqualification Claim / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant's conduct as director made him unfit to be concerned in the management of a company
- 2 Whether the defendant knew or should have known that BMS's transactions were connected with VAT fraud
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant knew, or wilfully shut his eyes to the fact, that all 43 impugned transactions were connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT; his conduct as director was unfit and merits disqualification.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; defendant found unfit to be concerned in the management of a company.
Orders
- Defendant disqualified from acting as director or being concerned in the management of a company for 13 years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment