Philcox v Wilson & Anor
The applicant has persistently issued claims and made applications which are totally without merit, satisfying the threshold for an ECRO. An objective assessment of the risk demonstrates that, if unrestrained, the applicant will continue to abuse the court's process. It is necessary, reasonable, and proportionate to...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Martin Philcox; Defendant: Andrew Wilson; Defendant: Karl Harrison
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Extended Civil Restraint Order Following Dismissal of Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Extended Civil Restraint Order granted
- Legal Topics
- Civil Restraint Orders, Abuse of Process, Vexatious Litigation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Philcox
Claimant
Andrew Wilson
Defendant
Karl Harrison
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Extended Civil Restraint Order Following Dismissal of Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has persistently issued claims or made applications which are totally without merit
- 2 Whether it is appropriate, necessary, and proportionate to make an Extended Civil Restraint Order (ECRO) against the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant has persistently issued claims and made applications which are totally without merit, satisfying the threshold for an ECRO. An objective assessment of the risk demonstrates that, if unrestrained, the applicant will continue to abuse the court's process. It is necessary, reasonable, and proportionate to make an ECRO for two years to protect the administration of justice.
Court Disposition
Extended Civil Restraint Order granted
Orders
- The applicant is restrained from issuing claims or making applications in the High Court or any County Court concerning any matter involving, relating to, touching upon or leading to these proceedings without first obtaining the permission of a judge for a period of two years from the date of this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment