Comsite Projects Ltd. v Andritz AG [2003] EWHC 958 (TCC) (30 April 2003)

Comsite Projects Ltd. v Andritz AG [2003] EWHC 958 (TCC) (30 April 2003)

The Building Services sub-contract works are physically and functionally integral to the building, not the plant; thus, they fall within the definition of 'construction operations' under section 105 of the Act. The dispute does not fall within the scope of the Austrian jurisdiction clause for the purposes of Article 23, so the English court has jurisdiction. The Part 8 procedure is appropriate as the factual issues are straightforward and sufficiently evidenced.

Citation
[2003] EWHC 958 (TCC)
Parties
Claimant: Comsite Projects Limited; Defendant: Andritz AG
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (declarations) / Judgment on Jurisdiction and Substantive Declarations
Outcome
Declarations granted in favour of Comsite
Legal Topics
Construction Operations Definition, Construction Contract Definition, Jurisdiction Under EC Regulation 44/2001, Appropriateness of Part 8 Procedure, Application of Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996
Construction Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Construction Operations Definition Construction Contract Definition Jurisdiction Under EC Regulation 44/2001 Appropriateness of Part 8 Procedure Application of Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Comsite Projects Limited

Claimant

Andritz AG

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Part 8 Claim (declarations) / Judgment on Jurisdiction and Substantive Declarations

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does the English court have jurisdiction to hear the Part 8 claim despite a contractual Austrian jurisdiction clause?
  2. 2 Is the Part 8 procedure appropriate for determining whether the Building Services sub-contract is a construction contract?
  3. 3 Does the Building Services sub-contract fall within the definition of 'construction operations' and 'construction contract' under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996?

Ratio Decidendi

The Building Services sub-contract works are physically and functionally integral to the building, not the plant; thus, they fall within the definition of 'construction operations' under section 105 of the Act. The dispute does not fall within the scope of the Austrian jurisdiction clause for the purposes of Article 23, so the English court has jurisdiction. The Part 8 procedure is appropriate as the factual issues are straightforward and sufficiently evidenced.

Court Disposition

Declarations granted in favour of Comsite

Orders

  • Declaration that Comsite's works under the Building Services sub-contract fall within the definition of 'construction operations' under section 105 of the Act
  • Declaration that the Building Services sub-contract constitutes a 'construction contract' under section 104 of the Act