A Company v Andy Thornton Contracts Ltd
The Company failed to demonstrate that the debt was disputed on substantial grounds or that it had a genuine and substantial cross-claim exceeding the debt. The evidence did not establish that the parties were bound by an arbitration clause. The Respondent is a creditor in a sum exceeding the statutory minimum and entitled to proceed with the winding up petition.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Company; Respondent: Andy Thornton Contracts Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Judgment on Application to Restrain Advertisement of Winding Up Petition
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up Petition, Debt Dispute, Cross Claim, Arbitration Clause, Contract Formation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Company
Claimant
Andy Thornton Contracts Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment on Application to Restrain Advertisement of Winding Up Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the debt claimed by the Respondent is disputed on substantial grounds
- 2 Whether the Company has a genuine and substantial cross-claim exceeding the petition debt
- 3 Whether an arbitration clause restrains the winding up petition
Ratio Decidendi
The Company failed to demonstrate that the debt was disputed on substantial grounds or that it had a genuine and substantial cross-claim exceeding the debt. The evidence did not establish that the parties were bound by an arbitration clause. The Respondent is a creditor in a sum exceeding the statutory minimum and entitled to proceed with the winding up petition.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application to restrain the advertisement of the winding up petition is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment