Angela Powell v The Information Commissioner & Anor
The EHRC was entitled to withhold the March request information, the percentage of men and women in each hourly pay quarter, and the median pay of men and women under section 40(2) FOIA as these constitute personal data and disclosure is not justified. However, the EHRC was not entitled to withhold mean pay for men, mean pay for women, the percentage difference between median pay for women and men, and the percentage difference between mean pay for women and men, as these do not reveal personal data or the legitimate interest in transparency outweighs the limited prejudice to data subjects' rights.
- Parties
- Appellant: Angela Powell; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Equality and Human Rights Commission
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Rehearing After Upper Tribunal Remittal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Personal Data, Gender Pay Gap, Equal Pay, Statutory Duties, Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angela Powell
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Equality and Human Rights Commission
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Rehearing After Upper Tribunal Remittal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requested information constitutes personal data under FOIA and DPA
- 2 Whether disclosure is necessary for legitimate interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR
- 3 Whether legitimate interests are overridden by data subjects' rights and freedoms
Ratio Decidendi
The EHRC was entitled to withhold the March request information, the percentage of men and women in each hourly pay quarter, and the median pay of men and women under section 40(2) FOIA as these constitute personal data and disclosure is not justified. However, the EHRC was not entitled to withhold mean pay for men, mean pay for women, the percentage difference between median pay for women and men, and the percentage difference between mean pay for women and men, as these do not reveal personal data or the legitimate interest in transparency outweighs the limited prejudice to data subjects' rights.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- EHRC to disclose mean pay for men, mean pay for women, percentage difference between median pay for women and men, and percentage difference between mean pay for women and men within 42 days.
- Any failure to comply may amount to contempt and be certified to the Upper Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment