R v Anh Ngyuen

R v Anh Ngyuen

The conviction was not unsafe as the applicant admitted responsibility, evidence including CCTV and repair costs supported the charge, and there was no coercion or procedural irregularity in the plea process.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Anh Nguyen
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Criminal Damage, Guilty Plea, Unsafe Conviction, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Criminal Damage Guilty Plea Unsafe Conviction Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Anh Nguyen

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's conviction following a guilty plea was unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was coerced or pressured into pleading guilty
  3. 3 Whether the applicant had a viable defence to criminal damage

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was not unsafe as the applicant admitted responsibility, evidence including CCTV and repair costs supported the charge, and there was no coercion or procedural irregularity in the plea process.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal refused