Oakley Inc v Animal Ltd. & Ors
Regulation 12 of the Registered Designs Regulations 2001 is ultra vires to the extent that it purports to apply the old national law to design registrations applied for after 28 October 2001, contrary to Directive 98/71/EC. The regulation is severable, and the remainder of the 2001 Regulations stands. If the ECJ rules that the derogation could not be exercised after 28 October 2001, the grace period applies to Oakley's design.
- Parties
- Claimant: Oakley Inc; Defendant: Animal Limited; Defendant: H Young Holdings PLC; Defendant: H Young (Operations) Limited; Intervener: Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Intellectual Property / Supplementary Judgment on Preliminary Point of Law
- Outcome
- Preliminary point decided in favour of Animal, subject to ECJ reference; permission to appeal granted; reference to ECJ ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Registered Designs, Ultra Vires, Implementation of EU Directives, Severability of Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oakley Inc
Claimant
Animal Limited
Defendant
H Young Holdings PLC
Defendant
H Young (Operations) Limited
Defendant
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Intellectual Property / Supplementary Judgment on Preliminary Point of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Regulation 12 of the Registered Designs Regulations 2001 was ultra vires
- 2 Whether the 12-month grace period applied to Oakley's registered design
- 3 Whether the United Kingdom could lawfully adopt the derogation in Article 11.8 of Directive 98/71/EC after 28 October 2001
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 12 of the Registered Designs Regulations 2001 is ultra vires to the extent that it purports to apply the old national law to design registrations applied for after 28 October 2001, contrary to Directive 98/71/EC. The regulation is severable, and the remainder of the 2001 Regulations stands. If the ECJ rules that the derogation could not be exercised after 28 October 2001, the grace period applies to Oakley's design.
Court Disposition
Preliminary point decided in favour of Animal, subject to ECJ reference; permission to appeal granted; reference to ECJ ordered.
Orders
- Secretary of State for Trade and Industry joined as a party for purposes of appeal and ECJ reference.
- Reference to the European Court of Justice under Article 234 of the Treaty for a preliminary ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment