Oakley Inc v Animal Ltd & Ors
Regulation 12 of the Registered Designs Regulations 2001 is ultra vires as the Secretary of State lacked power under section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 to implement a derogation not mandated by a Community obligation; the policy choice should have been made by Parliament. The derogation could not be...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Oakley Inc; Defendant: Animal Limited; Defendant: H Young Holdings PLC; Defendant: H Young (Operations) Limited; Interested Party: Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Point of Law
- Outcome
- Regulation 12 is ultra vires unless revised to apply only to registrations made before 28 October 2001; preliminary point of law decided in favour of Animal unless ECJ reference sought by Oakley.
- Legal Topics
- Ultra Vires, Registered Designs, Implementation of EU Directives, King Henry VIII Clauses, Derogations, Severability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oakley Inc
Claimant
Animal Limited
Defendant
H Young Holdings PLC
Defendant
H Young (Operations) Limited
Defendant
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Point of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Regulation 12 of the Registered Designs Regulations 2001 is ultra vires for implementing a derogation not mandated by a European obligation
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State had power under section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 to make Regulation 12
- 3 Whether the derogation could be exercised after the Directive's implementation deadline
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 12 of the Registered Designs Regulations 2001 is ultra vires as the Secretary of State lacked power under section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 to implement a derogation not mandated by a Community obligation; the policy choice should have been made by Parliament. The derogation could not be exercised after the Directive's deadline. Regulation 12 is valid only if revised to apply to registrations made before 28 October 2001; otherwise, it is ultra vires.
Court Disposition
Regulation 12 is ultra vires unless revised to apply only to registrations made before 28 October 2001; preliminary point of law decided in favour of Animal unless ECJ reference sought by Oakley.
Orders
- Regulation 12 takes effect subject to revision: only registrations applied for before 28 October 2001 may be governed by the old law of validity.
- If Oakley seeks ECJ reference, question to be referred under Article 234 of the Treaty.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment