Sardar v R
The evidence was sufficient for the jury to infer the appellant's participation in the construction of the fatal IED; anonymous defence witnesses were not admissible under s. 87(3) as the prosecution must be able to investigate; fresh evidence did not materially affect the issues of intention or defence; the minimum term for life imprisonment was reduced to 35 years to reflect mitigation and lesser role.
- Parties
- Appellant: Anis Abid Sardar; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction refused; appeal against sentence allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Conspiracy to Murder, Witness Anonymity, Fresh Evidence, Defence of Another, Sentencing Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anis Abid Sardar
Appellant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a case to answer for murder based on circumstantial evidence
- 2 Admissibility of anonymous defence witnesses under s. 87(3) Coroners and Justice Act 2009
- 3 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence was sufficient for the jury to infer the appellant's participation in the construction of the fatal IED; anonymous defence witnesses were not admissible under s. 87(3) as the prosecution must be able to investigate; fresh evidence did not materially affect the issues of intention or defence; the minimum term for life imprisonment was reduced to 35 years to reflect mitigation and lesser role.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction refused; appeal against sentence allowed in part.
Orders
- Minimum term for life imprisonment reduced from 38 years to 35 years.
- Sentence for conspiracy to murder remains unchanged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment