R v Anjum
The appeal succeeds in part because the methodology of supplementing keyword searches with manual review was appropriate given the complexity and nature of the evidence, and the claim for consideration of unused material was substantiated by contemporaneous correspondence showing timely disclosure. The court allowed...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Defendant: Anjum
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013, Special Preparation Fees, Consideration of Unused Material, PPE Count, Terrorism Offences
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Anjum
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to special preparation fees under Schedule 1 of the Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013
- 2 Entitlement to fees for consideration of unused material under Schedule 1, Paragraph 17A
- 3 Appropriate calculation of PPE count and hours for payment
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal succeeds in part because the methodology of supplementing keyword searches with manual review was appropriate given the complexity and nature of the evidence, and the claim for consideration of unused material was substantiated by contemporaneous correspondence showing timely disclosure. The court allowed 190 hours for special preparation and 80 hours for consideration of unused material, balancing the evidence and submissions against the Determining Officer's findings.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Appellant is allowed 190 hours for special preparation fees.
- Appellant is allowed 80 hours for consideration of unused material.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment