R v ANL
There is no authority justifying the Rule that a conviction for manslaughter is a bar to a retrial for murder arising from the same killing; the judge's order permitting a retrial for murder was correct.
- Parties
- Respondent: THE KING; Appellant: ANL
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Preparatory Hearing Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Retrial, Alternative Charges, Murder, Manslaughter, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2
Parties
THE KING
Respondent
ANL
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Preparatory Hearing Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a conviction for manslaughter bars a retrial for murder arising from the same killing
- 2 Whether the retrial for murder after a manslaughter conviction constitutes an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
There is no authority justifying the Rule that a conviction for manslaughter is a bar to a retrial for murder arising from the same killing; the judge's order permitting a retrial for murder was correct.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The judge's order permitting a retrial for murder stands.
- Retrial for murder against ANL is lawful.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment