XY Twins Inflicted Injury (Naming Perpetrator), Re
Publication of Emily Waters' name is necessary and proportionate to protect future children, ensure transparency, and address safeguarding gaps in an unregulated profession. Anonymisation is not justified as publication does not risk identifying the children, and existing safeguards relying on Ms Waters' assurances are insufficient given her dishonesty. The emotional impact on Ms Waters is regrettable but does not outweigh the public interest and safeguarding imperative.
- Parties
- Advocate for Local Authority: Sian Cox; Advocate for Mother: Jonathan Sampson KC; Advocate for Mother: Susan Quin; Advocate for Father: Joanne Brown KC; Advocate for Father: Tim Potter; Advocate for Children: Tim Hussein; Advocate for Children: Claire Fox; Advocate for Emily Waters: John Thornton; Advocate for Nurse 1: David Jockelson; Self Represented: Nurse 2; Intervener/perpetrator: Emily Waters
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Post Fact Finding Judgment on Publication/anonymisation
- Outcome
- Application to publish judgment naming Emily Waters as perpetrator granted.
- Legal Topics
- Anonymisation, Open Justice, Publication of Judgments, Article 8 ECHR, Article 10 ECHR, Safeguarding, Professional Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sian Cox
Advocate for Local Authority
Jonathan Sampson KC
Advocate for Mother
Susan Quin
Advocate for Mother
Joanne Brown KC
Advocate for Father
Tim Potter
Advocate for Father
Tim Hussein
Advocate for Children
Claire Fox
Advocate for Children
John Thornton
Advocate for Emily Waters
David Jockelson
Advocate for Nurse 1
Nurse 2
Self Represented
Emily Waters
Intervener/perpetrator
Procedural Posture
Family / Post Fact Finding Judgment on Publication/anonymisation
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the published judgment identify Emily Waters as perpetrator of the children's injuries?
- 2 Is publication of her name necessary and proportionate given Article 8 and Article 10 ECHR rights?
- 3 Does publication risk identifying the children or breach safeguarding principles?
Ratio Decidendi
Publication of Emily Waters' name is necessary and proportionate to protect future children, ensure transparency, and address safeguarding gaps in an unregulated profession. Anonymisation is not justified as publication does not risk identifying the children, and existing safeguards relying on Ms Waters' assurances are insufficient given her dishonesty. The emotional impact on Ms Waters is regrettable but does not outweigh the public interest and safeguarding imperative.
Court Disposition
Application to publish judgment naming Emily Waters as perpetrator granted.
Orders
- Fact-finding judgment to be published naming Emily Waters as perpetrator, subject to delay until conclusion of criminal process.
- Parents' request for permission to identify themselves deferred to subsequent hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment