Aziz v Ali & Anor

Aziz v Ali & Anor

The claimants knowingly made false statements in documents verified by statements of truth in support of fraudulent insurance claims, constituting contempt of court under CPR 32.14(1). The seriousness of the conduct, its impact on the administration of justice, and the need for deterrence justify custodial sentences, with limited mitigation for late admissions and genuine remorse.

Parties
Claimant: Mr Mohammed Adris Aziz; Defendant: Ansar Ali; Defendant: Esure Services Ltd; Claimant: Mr Abdul Jamil; Defendant: Mr Sherzad Serwan; Defendant: Liverpool Victoria Insurance Services; Claimant: Mrs Farhana Kazmi; Claimant: Mrs Shamila Saleem
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 November 2014
Procedural Posture
Committal Application for Contempt of Court / Judgment After Hearing of Committal Application
Outcome
Application for committal allowed; custodial sentences imposed for contempt of court.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, False Statements, Fraudulent Insurance Claims, Sanctions for Contempt
Civil Procedure Insurance Law Contempt of Court False Statements Fraudulent Insurance Claims Sanctions for Contempt

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Mohammed Adris Aziz

Claimant

Ansar Ali

Defendant

Esure Services Ltd

Defendant

Mr Abdul Jamil

Claimant

Mr Sherzad Serwan

Defendant

Liverpool Victoria Insurance Services

Defendant

Mrs Farhana Kazmi

Claimant

Mrs Shamila Saleem

Claimant

Procedural Posture

Committal Application for Contempt of Court / Judgment After Hearing of Committal Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimants made false statements in documents verified by a statement of truth without honest belief in their truth
  2. 2 Whether such conduct amounts to contempt of court under CPR 32.14(1)
  3. 3 What is the appropriate sanction for the contempt committed

Ratio Decidendi

The claimants knowingly made false statements in documents verified by statements of truth in support of fraudulent insurance claims, constituting contempt of court under CPR 32.14(1). The seriousness of the conduct, its impact on the administration of justice, and the need for deterrence justify custodial sentences, with limited mitigation for late admissions and genuine remorse.

Court Disposition

Application for committal allowed; custodial sentences imposed for contempt of court.

Orders

  • Mr Aziz: 6 months imprisonment
  • Mr Jamil: 8 months imprisonment