Ansys Inc v Lim & Anor [2000] EWCA Civ 56 (25 February 2000)
The contractual relationship between Ansys and SCL remained debtor-creditor post-termination; no express or implied trust arose over licence fees collected by SCL after termination. SCL was entitled to collect fees and owed Ansys only a contractual or restitutionary obligation, not a proprietary remedy.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 56
- Parties
- Applicant: Ansys Inc; Respondent: Structures and Computers Limited; Respondent: Lim Thuan Khee; Respondent: Tan Tiat Eng
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Distribution Agreements, Constructive Trusts, Implied Terms, Unjust Enrichment, Assignment of Contractual Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ansys Inc
Applicant
Structures and Computers Limited
Respondent
Lim Thuan Khee
Respondent
Tan Tiat Eng
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether SCL held post-termination licence fees in trust for Ansys
- 2 Whether SCL owed a proprietary obligation to Ansys for post-termination fees
- 3 Whether a constructive trust arose over licence fees collected by SCL after termination
Ratio Decidendi
The contractual relationship between Ansys and SCL remained debtor-creditor post-termination; no express or implied trust arose over licence fees collected by SCL after termination. SCL was entitled to collect fees and owed Ansys only a contractual or restitutionary obligation, not a proprietary remedy.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with Respondents' costs to be assessed at standard rate.
- Leave to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment