Bennett & Ors, R. v [2014] EWCA Crim 2652 (19 November 2014)
The judge's chronology did not contain significant errors or misstatements, the jury was properly directed, and the use of the chronology did not render the convictions unsafe; extended sentences were only justified where dangerousness was established.
- Citation
- [2014] EWCA Crim 2652
- Parties
- Appellant: Anthony Bennett; Appellant: Marcus Simpson; Appellant: Marcus Daniel Paul; Appellant: Dylan Addo; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals against conviction dismissed; appeals against sentence allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Firearms Offences, Conspiracy, Jury Directions, Extended Sentences, Dangerousness, Cell Site Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Bennett
Appellant
Marcus Simpson
Appellant
Marcus Daniel Paul
Appellant
Dylan Addo
Appellant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge's provision of a written chronology to the jury rendered the convictions unsafe
- 2 Whether extended sentences were properly imposed on certain defendants
- 3 Appropriateness of sentence lengths
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's chronology did not contain significant errors or misstatements, the jury was properly directed, and the use of the chronology did not render the convictions unsafe; extended sentences were only justified where dangerousness was established.
Court Disposition
Appeals against conviction dismissed; appeals against sentence allowed in part.
Orders
- Simpson's extended sentence quashed and substituted with a determinate sentence of 13 years and 6 months.
- Paul's extended sentence quashed and substituted with a determinate sentence of 12 years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment