Westwood v Knight [2012] EWPCC 14 (24 April 2012)
The defendant was in contempt of court for failing to comply with mandatory orders to deliver up infringing goods, serve a confirmatory affidavit, and transfer domain names, and for continuing to infringe the claimant's intellectual property rights and pass off goods in breach of injunctions. The defendant's asserted reasons for non-compliance (illness, appeal, ombudsman complaint) did not justify or excuse his conduct. The evidence established breaches to the criminal standard of proof.
- Citation
- [2012] EWPCC 14
- Parties
- Claimant: Dame Vivienne Westwood OBE; Defendant: Anthony Edward Knight
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court Application (committal Proceedings) / Judgment on Committal Application
- Outcome
- Application for committal granted in part; defendant found in contempt of court on specified grounds.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Passing Off, Committal for Contempt, Injunctions, Enforcement of Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dame Vivienne Westwood OBE
Claimant
Anthony Edward Knight
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Application (committal Proceedings) / Judgment on Committal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is in contempt of court for failing to comply with orders relating to delivery up of infringing goods, service of affidavit, transfer of domain names, and prohibitions on infringing and passing off activities.
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was in contempt of court for failing to comply with mandatory orders to deliver up infringing goods, serve a confirmatory affidavit, and transfer domain names, and for continuing to infringe the claimant's intellectual property rights and pass off goods in breach of injunctions. The defendant's asserted reasons for non-compliance (illness, appeal, ombudsman complaint) did not justify or excuse his conduct. The evidence established breaches to the criminal standard of proof.
Court Disposition
Application for committal granted in part; defendant found in contempt of court on specified grounds.
Orders
- Defendant found in contempt of court on grounds #1 to #7 and #9 to #17.
- Grounds #8, #9(ii), and #18 dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment