Intelligence UK Investigations Ltd v Anthony Hannon & Ors [2026] EWHC 856 (Ch) (11 February 2026)
The claim was brought for the benefit of Mr Millinder or at his direction, in breach of the section 42 order, and is therefore a nullity and must be dismissed.
- Citation
- [2026] EWHC 856 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Intelligence UK Investigations Ltd; Defendant: Anthony Hannon; Defendant: The Official Receiver of London; Defendant: Lord Chancellor; Defendant: Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim / Application to Set Aside Stay and Determination of Nullity Under Section 42 Senior Courts Act 1981
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed as a nullity, marked totally without merit.
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigant Orders, Section 42 Senior Courts Act 1981, Nullity of Proceedings, Assignment of Claims, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Intelligence UK Investigations Ltd
Claimant
Anthony Hannon
Defendant
The Official Receiver of London
Defendant
Lord Chancellor
Defendant
Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim / Application to Set Aside Stay and Determination of Nullity Under Section 42 Senior Courts Act 1981
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Part 8 Claim was instituted on behalf of or at the direction of Mr Millinder, a vexatious litigant subject to a section 42 order, without leave of the court
- 2 Whether the proceedings are a nullity and must be dismissed
Ratio Decidendi
The claim was brought for the benefit of Mr Millinder or at his direction, in breach of the section 42 order, and is therefore a nullity and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed as a nullity, marked totally without merit.
Orders
- The Part 8 Claim is dismissed as a nullity.
- The application to set aside the stay is dismissed as falling away.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment