R v Anthony Mark Brown

R v Anthony Mark Brown

The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive; the judge was entitled to conclude the offending fell at the top end of category 3 harm and category A culpability, and the aggravating factors justified the sentence. The driving disqualification was miscalculated and should be reduced to 44 months.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Anthony Mark Brown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 April 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
application for leave to appeal against sentence refused; appeal against driving disqualification allowed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Dangerousness, Driving Disqualification, Extended Sentence
Criminal Law Sentencing Dangerousness Driving Disqualification Extended Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Anthony Mark Brown

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the extended sentence of 5 years was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the driving disqualification period was correctly calculated

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive; the judge was entitled to conclude the offending fell at the top end of category 3 harm and category A culpability, and the aggravating factors justified the sentence. The driving disqualification was miscalculated and should be reduced to 44 months.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal against sentence refused; appeal against driving disqualification allowed

Orders

  • disqualification of 57 months quashed
  • disqualification of 44 months imposed