Simpson, R v [1998] EWCA Crim 392 (5th February, 1998)
There was no abuse of process or exceptional unfairness in the Croydon proceedings; the trial judge exercised proper discretion regarding the order of trials and severance. The appellant was not deprived of witnesses willing to give truthful evidence. The conviction is not unsafe under the current statutory test.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] EWCA Crim 392
- Parties
- Appellant: Anthony Simpson; Respondent: Regina (The Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Severance of Counts, Public Interest Immunity, Disclosure, Fair Trial, Unsafe Conviction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Simpson
Appellant
Regina (The Crown)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proceedings at Croydon Crown Court constituted an abuse of process rendering the subsequent trial unsafe
- 2 Whether the order of trials deprived the appellant of a fair opportunity to call witnesses, compromising his defence
Ratio Decidendi
There was no abuse of process or exceptional unfairness in the Croydon proceedings; the trial judge exercised proper discretion regarding the order of trials and severance. The appellant was not deprived of witnesses willing to give truthful evidence. The conviction is not unsafe under the current statutory test.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Conviction upheld; appeal against conviction dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment