Dmitrijev v Lithuanian Judicial Authority

Dmitrijev v Lithuanian Judicial Authority

There is no reasonably arguable ground of appeal as the Article 3 ECHR points relied upon have been conclusively rejected in previous Divisional Court judgments.

Parties
Appellant: Anton Dmitrijev; Respondent: Lithuanian Judicial Authority
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 August 2020
Procedural Posture
Extradition / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Article 3 ECHR, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, Permission to Appeal
Extradition Law Human Rights Law Article 3 ECHR Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Permission to Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anton Dmitrijev

Appellant

Lithuanian Judicial Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extradition / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether extradition to Lithuania would expose the appellant to a real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR
  2. 2 Whether there remained any viable Article 3 points following previous Divisional Court judgments

Ratio Decidendi

There is no reasonably arguable ground of appeal as the Article 3 ECHR points relied upon have been conclusively rejected in previous Divisional Court judgments.

Court Disposition

permission to appeal refused