AP v AF & Anor [2024] EWFC 104 (14 May 2024)
The court found that the risk of the mother not returning the child from Colombia is now very small to non-existent due to her strong and established ties to the UK, her compliance with all previous orders, and the significant detriment to the child if not permitted to visit Colombia. The court was satisfied that appropriate safeguards, including a charge on the mother's property and conditions regarding travel, would mitigate any residual risk. The welfare of the child, including his wishes and need to connect with his heritage, outweighed the minimal risk of non-return.
- Citation
- [2024] EWFC 104
- Parties
- Applicant: AP; First Respondent: AF; Second Respondent: O (by his Child's Guardian, Justine Radford)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Children / Final Hearing on Application to Discharge Prohibited Steps Order and Permit International Travel
- Outcome
- Application granted; prohibited steps order discharged; permission granted for holidays in Colombia subject to safeguards.
- Legal Topics
- Prohibited Steps Order, International Child Travel, Child Welfare, Hague Convention, Shared Care Arrangements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AP
Applicant
AF
First Respondent
O (by his Child's Guardian, Justine Radford)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Children / Final Hearing on Application to Discharge Prohibited Steps Order and Permit International Travel
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to discharge a prohibited steps order preventing removal of a child from the jurisdiction
- 2 Whether to permit the mother to take the child to Colombia for a holiday
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the risk of the mother not returning the child from Colombia is now very small to non-existent due to her strong and established ties to the UK, her compliance with all previous orders, and the significant detriment to the child if not permitted to visit Colombia. The court was satisfied that appropriate safeguards, including a charge on the mother's property and conditions regarding travel, would mitigate any residual risk. The welfare of the child, including his wishes and need to connect with his heritage, outweighed the minimal risk of non-return.
Court Disposition
Application granted; prohibited steps order discharged; permission granted for holidays in Colombia subject to safeguards.
Orders
- Prohibited steps order discharged.
- Mother permitted to take the child to Colombia for holidays of up to three weeks, subject to a charge on her property as security until the child is 16.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment