Nursing and Midwifery Council v Apiado [2012] EWHC 3386 (Admin) (07 November 2012)

Extension of the interim suspension order is necessary to protect the public and maintain public confidence in the regulatory process, given the serious nature of the allegations and ongoing risk.

Citation: [2012] EWHC 3386 (Admin)
Parties: Claimant: Nursing and Midwifery Council; Defendant: Apiado
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 07 November 2012
Procedural Posture: Application for Extension of Interim Suspension Order / Hearing of Application for Extension
Outcome: Application granted
Legal Topics: Interim Suspension Orders, Fitness to Practice, Public Protection

Administrative Law Professional Regulation Interim Suspension Orders Fitness to Practice Public Protection

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Nursing and Midwifery Council

Claimant

Apiado

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Interim Suspension Order / Hearing of Application for Extension

Legal Issues

1 Whether to extend the interim suspension order against the respondent's registration

Ratio Decidendi

Extension of the interim suspension order is necessary to protect the public and maintain public confidence in the regulatory process, given the serious nature of the allegations and ongoing risk.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

Interim suspension order extended for three months until 7 February 2013