MICHAEL WILSON AND PARTNERS LIMITED v JOHN FORSTER EMMOTT AND OTHERS

There is no realistic prospect of success because the application depended on conventional principles and the documents in question were not sufficiently mentioned for disclosure purposes.

Parties: Claimant: Michael Wilson and Partners Limited; First Defendant: John Forster Emmott; Second Defendant: Others
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 04 March 2022
Procedural Posture: Commercial / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome: application refused
Legal Topics: Appeals, Disclosure of Documents

Civil Procedure Appeals Disclosure of Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Michael Wilson and Partners Limited

Claimant

John Forster Emmott

First Defendant

Others

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 whether documents referred to in documents attached to witness statements should be disclosed by reason of being impliedly mentioned

Ratio Decidendi

There is no realistic prospect of success because the application depended on conventional principles and the documents in question were not sufficiently mentioned for disclosure purposes.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

application for permission to appeal is refused