Pommell, R. v [1995] EWCA Crim 7 (16 May 1995)
The defence of necessity or duress of circumstances was open to the appellant in respect of his acquisition of the gun; the judge should have left the issue to the jury, as the delay in going to the police and the appellant's explanation were matters for the jury to assess. The judge erred in ruling out the defence before evidence was heard.
- Citation
- [1995] EWCA Crim 7
- Parties
- Defendant: Appellant; Prosecution: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- convictions on first indictment set aside; new trial ordered
- Legal Topics
- Firearms Offences, Defence of Necessity, Duress of Circumstances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Defendant
Crown
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defence of necessity or duress of circumstances was available to the appellant for possession of a firearm and ammunition under the Firearms Act 1968
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in ruling out the defence before evidence was heard
Ratio Decidendi
The defence of necessity or duress of circumstances was open to the appellant in respect of his acquisition of the gun; the judge should have left the issue to the jury, as the delay in going to the police and the appellant's explanation were matters for the jury to assess. The judge erred in ruling out the defence before evidence was heard.
Court Disposition
convictions on first indictment set aside; new trial ordered
Orders
- Fresh indictment to be preferred within two months
- Appellant to remain in custody pending retrial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment