De Souza v Automobile Association [1985] EWCA Civ 13 (19 December 1985)
A racial insult, even if overheard by the employee and causing distress, does not by itself constitute 'detriment' under section 4(2)(c) of the Race Relations Act 1976 unless it can be shown that the employee was thereby disadvantaged in the circumstances of employment. The Industrial Tribunal made no sufficient finding that the appellant was so disadvantaged, nor that the act was intended to be known to her or to affect her employment context. Therefore, the complaint was bound to fail.
- Citation
- [1985] EWCA Civ 13
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant (name not specified); Respondent: Respondents (name not specified)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Discrimination Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Detriment in Employment, Employer Liability, Injury to Feelings, Interpretation of Race Relations Act 1976
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant (name not specified)
Appellant
Respondents (name not specified)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Discrimination Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a racial insult overheard by an employee constitutes 'detriment' under section 4(2)(c) of the Race Relations Act 1976
- 2 Whether the employer is liable for acts of employees under section 32 of the Act
- 3 Whether the facts established less favourable treatment or detriment within the statutory meaning
Ratio Decidendi
A racial insult, even if overheard by the employee and causing distress, does not by itself constitute 'detriment' under section 4(2)(c) of the Race Relations Act 1976 unless it can be shown that the employee was thereby disadvantaged in the circumstances of employment. The Industrial Tribunal made no sufficient finding that the appellant was so disadvantaged, nor that the act was intended to be known to her or to affect her employment context. Therefore, the complaint was bound to fail.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Application for leave to appeal to the House of Lords refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment