Williams, R. v [2000] EWCA Crim 3531 (26 October 2000)
It is permissible to impose both a confiscation order and a compensation order in identical sums where both represent the same loss, as the statutory scheme intends to strip the offender of the proceeds of crime and compensate victims, and the court is not required to make allowance for the value of work performed...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Crim 3531
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant (unnamed); Respondent: Crown (Prosecution)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Orders (confiscation and Compensation)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Orders, Compensation Orders, Fraud, Sentencing, Powers of Criminal Courts
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant (unnamed)
Appellant
Crown (Prosecution)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Orders (confiscation and Compensation)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the imposition of both a confiscation order and a compensation order in identical sums is permissible where both represent the same loss
- 2 Whether allowance should be made for the value of work performed by the defendant when making compensation orders
Ratio Decidendi
It is permissible to impose both a confiscation order and a compensation order in identical sums where both represent the same loss, as the statutory scheme intends to strip the offender of the proceeds of crime and compensate victims, and the court is not required to make allowance for the value of work performed in such criminal proceedings.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- confiscation order in the sum of £141,950 upheld
- compensation order in the sum of £141,000 upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment