Davis, R v [2000] EWCA Crim 77 (20th December, 2000)

Davis, R v [2000] EWCA Crim 77 (20th December, 2000)

The repeated jury discharges did not amount to abuse of process as they were not caused by prosecution misconduct, and the evidence against the appellant was overwhelming. The admission of documents for handwriting comparison was proper with prejudicial content redacted. The ordeal of four retrials justified a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] EWCA Crim 77
Parties
Respondent: The Crown; Appellant: Appellant (unnamed); Co Accused: Reece Packard
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal against sentence allowed.
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Admissibility of Evidence, Sentencing, Fair Trial, European Convention on Human Rights Article 6
Criminal Law Abuse of Process Admissibility of Evidence Sentencing Fair Trial European Convention on Human Rights Article 6

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Crown

Respondent

Appellant (unnamed)

Appellant

Reece Packard

Co Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proceedings should have been stayed for abuse of process due to repeated jury discharges
  2. 2 Whether the admission of prejudicial documents for handwriting comparison was proper
  3. 3 Whether the sentence should be reduced due to the ordeal of multiple retrials

Ratio Decidendi

The repeated jury discharges did not amount to abuse of process as they were not caused by prosecution misconduct, and the evidence against the appellant was overwhelming. The admission of documents for handwriting comparison was proper with prejudicial content redacted. The ordeal of four retrials justified a reduction in sentence.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal against sentence allowed.

Orders

  • Sentence reduced from seven years to five years imprisonment.