Jones, R v [2000] EWCA Crim 3543 (17 February 2000)
Section 17(2) of the Firearms Act 1968 does not require proof of actual commission of a scheduled offence; lawful arrest for such an offence suffices for conviction unless a lawful object for possession is shown.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Crim 3543
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Firearms Offences, Statutory Interpretation, Scheduled Offences, Lawful Arrest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 17(2) of the Firearms Act 1968 requires proof of actual commission of a scheduled offence before conviction
- 2 Whether lawful arrest for a scheduled offence suffices for conviction under section 17(2)
Ratio Decidendi
Section 17(2) of the Firearms Act 1968 does not require proof of actual commission of a scheduled offence; lawful arrest for such an offence suffices for conviction unless a lawful object for possession is shown.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction under section 17(2) of the Firearms Act 1968 upheld
- sentence of 6 months' imprisonment to run consecutively to 30 months' imprisonment confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment