Optis Cellular Technology LLC & Ors v Apple Retail UK Ltd & Ors [2020] EWHC 2746 (Pat) (16 October 2020)
The patent is valid and essential to the relevant versions of the GSM/UMTS/LTE standards. The conversion step in the claims requires both comparability and formatting, as understood by the skilled person. The patent is not invalid for obviousness or insufficiency on the facts and evidence presented. Apple infringes if it implements the relevant standards.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 2746 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant: Optis Cellular Technology LLC; Claimant: Optis Wireless Technology LLC; Claimant: Unwired Planet International Ltd; Defendant: Apple Retail UK Ltd; Defendant: Apple Distribution International Ltd; Defendant: Apple Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Validity Action / First Instance Trial (trial A)
- Outcome
- Patent held valid and essential; Apple found to infringe if implementing the standard.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Validity, Patent Essentiality, Obviousness, Insufficiency, Standards Essential Patents, Telecommunications Standards, Claim Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Optis Cellular Technology LLC
Claimant
Optis Wireless Technology LLC
Claimant
Unwired Planet International Ltd
Claimant
Apple Retail UK Ltd
Defendant
Apple Distribution International Ltd
Defendant
Apple Inc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Validity Action / First Instance Trial (trial A)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether EP (UK) 1 230 818 is valid
- 2 Whether the patent is essential to the GSM/UMTS/LTE standards
- 3 Whether the patent is infringed by Apple
Ratio Decidendi
The patent is valid and essential to the relevant versions of the GSM/UMTS/LTE standards. The conversion step in the claims requires both comparability and formatting, as understood by the skilled person. The patent is not invalid for obviousness or insufficiency on the facts and evidence presented. Apple infringes if it implements the relevant standards.
Court Disposition
Patent held valid and essential; Apple found to infringe if implementing the standard.
Orders
- Declaration of validity and essentiality of EP (UK) 1 230 818
- Costs and further directions to be determined
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment