17 Spurr Street, Sheffield S2 3GY (Housing Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2019] UKFTT RP_AN_00CG_HSA_2019_0001 (10 April 2019)
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required to hold a licence under the Housing Act 2004, did not do so, and therefore committed a relevant offence. The Tribunal determined that a rent repayment order should be made in favour of the applicant.
- Citation
- [2019] UKFTT RP_AN_00CG_HSA_2019_0001
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant (unnamed); Respondent: Respondent (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Rent repayment order granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses, Housing Act 2004, Housing and Planning Act 2016
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant (unnamed)
Applicant
Respondent (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was required to hold a licence under the Housing Act 2004
- 2 Whether the respondent committed an offence under the Housing Act 2004 by controlling or managing an unlicensed house
- 3 Whether a rent repayment order should be made under the Housing and Planning Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required to hold a licence under the Housing Act 2004, did not do so, and therefore committed a relevant offence. The Tribunal determined that a rent repayment order should be made in favour of the applicant.
Court Disposition
Rent repayment order granted
Orders
- The respondent must pay the applicant a specified sum by way of rent repayment order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment