171 Hawton Crescent, Nottingham NG8 1EG ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2019] UKFTT RP_BIR_00FY_HMF_2019_0003 (21 November 2019)
The Tribunal found that the respondent had committed an offence by managing or controlling an unlicensed HMO and that a rent repayment order was appropriate under the Housing and Planning Act 2016.
- Citation
- [2019] UKFTT RP_BIR_00FY_HMF_2019_0003
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant (unnamed); Respondent: Respondent (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / Decision
- Outcome
- Rent repayment order granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses, Housing Act 2004, Housing and Planning Act 2016
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Applicant (unnamed)
Applicant
Respondent (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord committed an offence under the Housing Act 2004 by controlling or managing an unlicensed house in multiple occupation (HMO)
- 2 Whether a rent repayment order should be made under the Housing and Planning Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent had committed an offence by managing or controlling an unlicensed HMO and that a rent repayment order was appropriate under the Housing and Planning Act 2016.
Court Disposition
Rent repayment order granted
Orders
- Respondent to pay the applicant a specified sum by way of rent repayment order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment