17 Jarman Court, 68 Maybury Road, Woking GU21 5JD ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2019] UKFTT RP_CHI_43UM_HMJ_2019_0003 (4 December 2019)
The Tribunal found that the landlord was required to have a licence for the property, failed to obtain one, and therefore committed an offence justifying a rent repayment order.
- Citation
- [2019] UKFTT RP_CHI_43UM_HMJ_2019_0003
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant (unnamed); Respondent: Respondent (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Rent repayment order granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation, Penalties for Unlicensed Letting
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Applicant (unnamed)
Applicant
Respondent (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord was required to hold a licence under the Housing Act 2004
- 2 Whether the landlord failed to obtain a licence and committed an offence
- 3 Whether a rent repayment order should be made and for what amount
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the landlord was required to have a licence for the property, failed to obtain one, and therefore committed an offence justifying a rent repayment order.
Court Disposition
Rent repayment order granted
Orders
- Landlord to repay rent to the applicant for the relevant period
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment