5 Cassandra Close, Coventry, West Midlands, CV4 7HN ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2020] UKFTT BIR_00CQ_HMK_2019_0064 (8 April 2020)
The Tribunal found that the respondent committed an offence by managing or controlling an unlicensed HMO and determined that a rent repayment order was appropriate for the relevant period.
- Citation
- [2020] UKFTT BIR_00CQ_HMK_2019_0064
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant (unnamed); Respondent: Respondent (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Rent repayment order granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation, Penalties for Unlicensed Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Applicant (unnamed)
Applicant
Respondent (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was required to hold a licence for the property under the Housing Act 2004
- 2 Whether the respondent committed an offence under section 72(1) of the Housing Act 2004 by controlling or managing an unlicensed HMO
- 3 Whether a rent repayment order should be made and the amount to be repaid
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent committed an offence by managing or controlling an unlicensed HMO and determined that a rent repayment order was appropriate for the relevant period.
Court Disposition
Rent repayment order granted
Orders
- Respondent to repay specified amount of rent to applicant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment