Flat 4, 64 Addison Street, Nottingham NG1 4HA ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2020] UKFTT BIR_00FY_HMK_2019_0089 (2 April 2020)
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required to hold a licence for the property and failed to do so, justifying the making of a rent repayment order in favour of the applicant.
- Citation
- [2020] UKFTT BIR_00FY_HMK_2019_0089
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant (unnamed); Respondent: Respondent (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Applicant (unnamed)
Applicant
Respondent (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was required to hold a licence under the Housing Act 2004 for the property
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a rent repayment order under the Housing and Planning Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required to hold a licence for the property and failed to do so, justifying the making of a rent repayment order in favour of the applicant.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Respondent to pay a rent repayment order to the applicant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment