3 St Marks Grove, Easton, Bristol BS5 0LJ ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2022] UKFTT CHI_00HB_HMF_2022_0008 (22 November 2022)
The Tribunal found that the respondent had committed the relevant offence by managing or controlling an unlicensed HMO and that a rent repayment order was appropriate under the circumstances.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] UKFTT CHI_00HB_HMF_2022_0008
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant (unnamed); Respondent: Respondent (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Rent repayment order granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation, Penalties for Unlicensed Properties
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant (unnamed)
Applicant
Respondent (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent committed an offence under the Housing Act 2004 by controlling or managing an unlicensed house in multiple occupation
- 2 Whether a rent repayment order should be made under the Housing and Planning Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent had committed the relevant offence by managing or controlling an unlicensed HMO and that a rent repayment order was appropriate under the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Rent repayment order granted
Orders
- Respondent to pay the applicant a specified sum by way of rent repayment order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment