109 Broadley Street, London NW88BA ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2023] UKFTT LON_OOBK_HMB_2022_0002 (27 January 2023)
The tribunal found that the respondent was required to have a licence for the property and failed to obtain one, constituting an offence under section 72(1) of the Housing Act 2004. The applicant was entitled to a rent repayment order for the relevant period.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] UKFTT LON_OOBK_HMB_2022_0002
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant (unnamed); Respondent: Respondent (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses, Housing Act 2004, Housing and Planning Act 2016
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant (unnamed)
Applicant
Respondent (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was required to obtain a licence for the property under the Housing Act 2004
- 2 Whether the respondent committed an offence by controlling or managing an unlicensed house
- 3 Whether a rent repayment order should be made and for what amount
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent was required to have a licence for the property and failed to obtain one, constituting an offence under section 72(1) of the Housing Act 2004. The applicant was entitled to a rent repayment order for the relevant period.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Respondent to pay a rent repayment order to the applicant for the specified period
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment