Finnerty, Application for Reconsideration by, [2022] PBRA 132 (20 September 2022)

Finnerty, Application for Reconsideration by, [2022] PBRA 132 (20 September 2022)

The Parole Board's decision was procedurally unfair because it failed to make clear findings of fact regarding key allegations and did not provide sufficient reasons for its conclusions, thereby undermining the fairness of the process.

Citation
[2022] PBRA 132
Parties
Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 September 2022
Procedural Posture
Parole Board Reconsideration / Application for Reconsideration of Parole Board Decision
Outcome
Application for reconsideration granted
Legal Topics
Parole Board Procedure, Assessment of Risk, Procedural Fairness, Findings of Fact, Unproven Allegations
Criminal Law Administrative Law Parole Board Procedure Assessment of Risk Procedural Fairness Findings of Fact Unproven Allegations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant

Applicant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Parole Board Reconsideration / Application for Reconsideration of Parole Board Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Parole Board's decision was procedurally unfair due to inadequate findings of fact and reasoning regarding unproven allegations
  2. 2 Whether the panel properly evaluated the evidential basis for allegations in assessing risk

Ratio Decidendi

The Parole Board's decision was procedurally unfair because it failed to make clear findings of fact regarding key allegations and did not provide sufficient reasons for its conclusions, thereby undermining the fairness of the process.

Court Disposition

Application for reconsideration granted

Orders

  • The case is to be reviewed by a fresh panel by way of an oral hearing.