Harrison, Application for Reconsideration by, [2022] PBRA 85 (14 July 2022)
The original decision was flawed as it failed to consider all facts and did not pursue an essential line of enquiry regarding the Applicant's exclusion zone breach.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] PBRA 85
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Reconsideration / Judgment on Reconsideration
- Outcome
- Application for Reconsideration granted
- Legal Topics
- Reconsideration, Exclusion Zone Breach
Administrative Law Reconsideration Exclusion Zone Breach
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Applicant
Applicant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Reconsideration / Judgment on Reconsideration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original decision failed to consider all facts
- 2 Whether an essential line of enquiry regarding the Applicant's exclusion zone breach was not pursued
Ratio Decidendi
The original decision was flawed as it failed to consider all facts and did not pursue an essential line of enquiry regarding the Applicant's exclusion zone breach.
Court Disposition
Application for Reconsideration granted
Orders
- Further directions to be made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment