PT v Romanian Judicial Authority [2024] EWHC 1269 (Admin) (14 May 2024)
Exceptional circumstances exist due to the availability of new medical evidence indicating a real risk of injustice if the appeal is not re-opened; the requirements of CPR 50.27 are satisfied for Article 8 and s.25 points but not for s.20, as the Supreme Court has determined that ticking Box 3.4 entitles the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 1269 (Admin)
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Romanian Judicial Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Appeal / Application to Re Open Appeal and Admit Fresh Evidence
- Outcome
- Partially allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extradition, Fresh Evidence, Article 3 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Right to Retrial, Finality of Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant
Applicant
Romanian Judicial Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Application to Re Open Appeal and Admit Fresh Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be re-opened under Criminal Procedure Rules 50.27
- 2 Whether fresh medical evidence justifies re-opening the appeal
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to a retrial under s.20 of the Extradition Act 2003
Ratio Decidendi
Exceptional circumstances exist due to the availability of new medical evidence indicating a real risk of injustice if the appeal is not re-opened; the requirements of CPR 50.27 are satisfied for Article 8 and s.25 points but not for s.20, as the Supreme Court has determined that ticking Box 3.4 entitles the applicant to a retrial.
Court Disposition
Partially allowed
Orders
- Leave granted to re-open the appeal in respect of Article 8 and s.25 points.
- Leave refused to re-open the appeal on the s.20 point.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment