19 St. Margaret Road, Coventry CV1 2BT ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2020] UKFTT BIR_00CQ_HMK_2020_0045 (23 October 2020)
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required to hold a licence for the property, failed to do so, and committed an offence under the Housing Act 2004. A rent repayment order was therefore appropriate.
- Citation
- [2020] UKFTT BIR_00CQ_HMK_2020_0045
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant(s) (names not specified); Respondent: Respondent (name not specified)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Rent repayment order granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation, Penalties for Unlicensed Properties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant(s) (names not specified)
Applicant
Respondent (name not specified)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was required to hold a licence under the Housing Act 2004 for the property at 19 St. Margaret Road, Coventry CV1 2BT
- 2 Whether the respondent committed an offence by controlling or managing an unlicensed house in multiple occupation
- 3 Whether a rent repayment order should be made and the quantum thereof
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required to hold a licence for the property, failed to do so, and committed an offence under the Housing Act 2004. A rent repayment order was therefore appropriate.
Court Disposition
Rent repayment order granted
Orders
- Respondent to pay specified amount to applicant(s) as rent repayment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment