67 Harpes Road Oxford OX2 7QJ ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2020] UKFTT CAM_38UC_HMF_2019_0017 (12 June 2020)
The Tribunal found that the landlord had committed an offence by managing or controlling an unlicensed HMO and that a rent repayment order was appropriate under the Housing and Planning Act 2016.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] UKFTT CAM_38UC_HMF_2019_0017
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant(s) (names not specified); Respondent: Respondent(s) (names not specified)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Rent repayment order granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses, Housing Act 2004, Housing and Planning Act 2016
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant(s) (names not specified)
Applicant
Respondent(s) (names not specified)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord committed an offence under the Housing Act 2004 by controlling or managing an unlicensed house in multiple occupation (HMO)
- 2 Whether a rent repayment order should be made under the Housing and Planning Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the landlord had committed an offence by managing or controlling an unlicensed HMO and that a rent repayment order was appropriate under the Housing and Planning Act 2016.
Court Disposition
Rent repayment order granted
Orders
- Respondent to pay specified amount to applicant(s) as a rent repayment order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment