58 Selkirk Road, London SW17 0ES - Ref ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2020] UKFTT LON_00BJ_HMF_2020_0031 (9 November 2020)
The Tribunal found that the landlord had committed the offence of managing or controlling an unlicensed HMO and that the applicant was entitled to a rent repayment order for the relevant period.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] UKFTT LON_00BJ_HMF_2020_0031
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant(s) (names not specified); Respondent: Respondent(s) (names not specified)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / Decision
- Outcome
- Rent repayment order granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses, Housing Act 2004, Housing and Planning Act 2016
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant(s) (names not specified)
Applicant
Respondent(s) (names not specified)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord committed an offence under the Housing Act 2004 by controlling or managing an unlicensed house in multiple occupation (HMO)
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a rent repayment order under the Housing and Planning Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the landlord had committed the offence of managing or controlling an unlicensed HMO and that the applicant was entitled to a rent repayment order for the relevant period.
Court Disposition
Rent repayment order granted
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay the applicant a specified sum by way of rent repayment order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment