20a Shirehall Close, Hendon, NW4 2QP ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2022] UKFTT LON_00AC_HMK_2019_0064 (16 May 2022)
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required to hold a licence for the property, failed to do so, and therefore the applicant was entitled to a rent repayment order for the relevant period.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] UKFTT LON_00AC_HMK_2019_0064
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant(s) (names not specified); Respondent: Respondent(s) (names not specified)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation, Penalties for Unlicensed Properties
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant(s) (names not specified)
Applicant
Respondent(s) (names not specified)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was required to hold a licence under the Housing Act 2004 for the property in question
- 2 Whether the respondent failed to obtain the required licence
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to a rent repayment order under the Housing and Planning Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required to hold a licence for the property, failed to do so, and therefore the applicant was entitled to a rent repayment order for the relevant period.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Respondent to pay a rent repayment order to the applicant for the relevant period of unlicensed occupation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment