89 Teignmouth Road, Selly Oak, Birmingham, B29 7AX ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2020] UKFTT BIR_00CN_HMK_2020_0030 (5 November 2020)
The Tribunal found that the landlord had managed or controlled an unlicensed house in multiple occupation and made a rent repayment order in favour of the applicant tenants.
- Citation
- [2020] UKFTT BIR_00CN_HMK_2020_0030
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant(s); Respondent: Respondent(s)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / Decision
- Outcome
- Rent repayment order granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Applicant(s)
Applicant
Respondent(s)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord committed an offence under the Housing Act 2004 by controlling or managing an unlicensed house in multiple occupation
- 2 Whether a rent repayment order should be made under the Housing and Planning Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the landlord had managed or controlled an unlicensed house in multiple occupation and made a rent repayment order in favour of the applicant tenants.
Court Disposition
Rent repayment order granted
Orders
- The landlord is ordered to repay rent to the applicant(s) for the relevant period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment