AQ (Kenya) v Entry Clearance Officer
The Tribunal's findings that the appellant was not in a dire situation and not dependent on the sponsor were perverse and irrational, failing to properly consider evidence of financial and emotional dependency and the appellant's inability to live elsewhere; the appeal should be allowed and reconsidered by a...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: AQ (Kenya); Respondent: Entry Clearance Officer
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Appeal / Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Entry Clearance, Child Reunification, Immigration Rules Paragraph 297, Burden of Proof, Refugee Status
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AQ (Kenya)
Appellant
Entry Clearance Officer
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant satisfied the requirements of Immigration Rules paragraph 297(i)(f)(iii)
- 2 Whether there were serious and compelling family or other considerations making exclusion undesirable
- 3 Whether the appellant was not leading an independent life and had not formed an independent family unit
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's findings that the appellant was not in a dire situation and not dependent on the sponsor were perverse and irrational, failing to properly consider evidence of financial and emotional dependency and the appellant's inability to live elsewhere; the appeal should be allowed and reconsidered by a differently constituted Tribunal.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Order for reconsideration before a differently constituted Asylum and Immigration Tribunal
- AIT to list reconsideration as soon as reasonably practicable
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment